Aug. 21, 2012 at 6:28pm with 17 notes
Reblogged from secularsociety
I had a thought while reading a physics book last night
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle means that we can’t simultaneously know the velocity of a particle and its position in space. The very concept of true omniscience is therefore moot. So even if there was an entity approaching what we conceive of as god, it could not be omniscient, as this would invalidate the very universe it created.
I’m sure some philosopher or other has already articulated this better than me though.
But that subjects the Creator to the very laws that he created, which is not a necessary conclusion derived from there being laws of nature.
-
asparrowfalls likes this
-
gorgeouswhiteman reblogged this from deconversionmovement
-
absinthe-and-apathy likes this
-
deconversionmovement reblogged this from joshuadylan and added:
I think it’s important to make a distinction: hypothetical human omniscience and the omniscience your god is said to...
-
debediahlin likes this
-
joshuadylan reblogged this from deconversionmovement and added:
And for what reason does omniscience necessarily meant that emotion is invalidated? Say you knew ahead of time that your...
-
leftistnaija likes this
-
secularsociety reblogged this from deconversionmovement and added:
Damn I’m outsourcing all my arguments from now on
-
this-is-ninjaneering likes this
-
thenewenlightenmentage likes this
-
onfireforgod likes this
-
secularsociety posted this